airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Subho Banerjee <subs.z...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GSOC Progress?
Date Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:13:56 GMT
Hi,
I would just like to suggest that we each keep our html files and then put
everything together at the end when the entire application is prepared.

Cheers,
Subho.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Amila
>
> The explanation of structure is as follows.
>
> /:.
> ├───index.html ... This is the main xbay UI file,as we are building the 1
> page application                                layout of all
> interfaces(workflow composer,execution
>                  interface,messenger) will reside in this.
> ├───css           .... This folder will contain all the stylesheets, the
> one provided by the 3                                parties like (twitter
> bootstrap etc) wil go to vendor folder, and one
>        customized by us will be at the root of css folder.
>     └───vendor
> ├───doc           ....  all the documentation for the interfaces
>
> ├───img          .....  all the images like logos,icons etc
>
> └───js             ....  custom js will be at the root of js folder
>     ├───vendor  .... all 3rd party lib like
> jquery,angular,bootstrap.js,jsv.js etc will go here
>     ├───model   ....  all js code, dealing with application data
>     └───controlers   .. all js code ,affecting the application behavior
>
>
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amila,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Amila Jayasekara <
>> thejaka.amila@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Below svn structure is now in
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/airavata/sandbox/gsoc2013.
>>>
>>> Also may I know what you meant by "vendor" ?
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK, all 3rd party js files goes to there, eg: jquery.js​
>>
>>
>> Further where are you going to place  tests cases in below svn structure ?
>>>
>>
>> ​What about create a top level directory called "test" for all test cases?
>>
>>>
>>> When submitting patches please let us know where to place code.
>>>
>>> @Shameera : I see you have submitted a js file as a patch to [1]. Please
>>> let me know where to place the file in below svn structure
>>>
>> ​​
>> ​I think registryAPI.js file should go to js directory. ​And
>> registryRestService.patch for trunk
>>
>>
>>> and great if you can submit test cases for that as well.
>>>
>>
>> ​Sure Amila I will provide test cases for this.​
>>
>> @Subho could you please explain the structure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-887
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Amila
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As discussed and suggested by subho lets have the html5 boilerplate
>>>> structure.
>>>>
>>>> /:.
>>>> ├───index.html
>>>> ├───css
>>>>     └───vendor
>>>> ├───doc
>>>> ├───img
>>>> └───js
>>>>     ├───vendor
>>>>     ├───model
>>>>     └───controlers
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > This is indeed great progress. + 1 for regular hangouts amongst
>>>> yourself.
>>>> > And please call out when ever you need help with a specific component
>>>> and
>>>> > we can join in as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > Guys, please *no* for a separate repository. We have so many active
>>>> > committers and you should have your contributions committed to gsoc
>>>> sandbox
>>>> > with minimal latency. We can commit and then review to GSOC sandbox,
>>>> for
>>>> > trunk it will be review and commit so it will be slow.
>>>> >
>>>> > So please suggest a directory strictly and contribute to repos. As
>>>> part of
>>>> > Apache GSOC we are required to teach contributing patches and working
>>>> in
>>>> > this setting.
>>>> >
>>>> > Suresh
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The session was great and cleared most of the confusion.Apart from
>>>> the
>>>> > > above points it was also decided
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 5. To have a common repository on Git as it easy to merge there.Let
>>>> one
>>>> > of
>>>> > > us create the repo and all others just fork it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 6. Also lets define the different stubs as discussed so that
>>>> everyone can
>>>> > > use them.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards
>>>> > > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> > > danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> Hi all,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> We had a quite fruitful session that helped iron out some of
the
>>>> issues
>>>> > >> that we had. It was decided to have hangout sessions at regular
>>>> > intervals
>>>> > >> to help keep the momentum and have everyone on the same page.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> It was decided to have the following action plan for next week.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 1. Danushka : Submit a patch for the Airavata/AMQP client API
>>>> (initial
>>>> > >> cut).
>>>> > >> 2. Shameera : Submit a patch for the protocol conversion JS
API
>>>> (initial
>>>> > >> cut).
>>>> > >> 3. Vijayendra : Submit a patch for the monitoring implementation
>>>> based
>>>> > on
>>>> > >> pub/sub.
>>>> > >> 4. Subho : Discuss the directory structure for UI on dev@ and
>>>> submit a
>>>> > >> patch for  workflow composition UI (initial cut).
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Guys, please add whatever that I have missed.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> > >> shameerainfo@gmail.com
>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> Hi,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> In that Hangout we can come to final svn repo structure
too, I
>>>> have
>>>> > some
>>>> > >>> code in my local machine and better move it to a safe location.
I
>>>> have
>>>> > >>> written JS client interface to call set of registry rest
api
>>>> > resources, I
>>>> > >>> have tested and it is working), once this finish ( will
finish
>>>> ASAP)
>>>> > >> others
>>>> > >>> can use that for their development.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>>> > >>> Shameera.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> > >>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>> Hi Amila,
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Sure I will.
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Danushka
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Amila Jayasekara <
>>>> > >>> thejaka.amila@gmail.com
>>>> > >>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Hi Danushka,
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> If you can publish hangout URL to dev list, some
of the people
>>>> in dev
>>>> > >>>> list
>>>> > >>>>> may also be able to join (if available).
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Thanks
>>>> > >>>>> Amila
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
<
>>>> > >>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> Suresh,
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> We are planning to have a hangout session tonight
(IST). I will
>>>> > >> keep
>>>> > >>>> the
>>>> > >>>>>> list updated after that.
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> > >>>>>> Danushka
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Suresh Marru
<
>>>> smarru@apache.org>
>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> The spike of enthusiasm quickly spurred
down. Am i looking in
>>>> the
>>>> > >>>> wrong
>>>> > >>>>>>> svn repo and JIRA, Airavata ones do not
show any gsoc
>>>> > >> contributions
>>>> > >>>>> yet.
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> Suresh
>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Suresh Marru
<smarru@apache.org>
>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> Did all the students gave up on GSOC
projects and decided to
>>>> > >> fail
>>>> > >>>> the
>>>> > >>>>>>> mid-term?
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> This is unusually quite period when
it is supposed to be high
>>>> > >>>> coding
>>>> > >>>>>>> time with atleast 30 -40 hours of coding.
Other than sporadic
>>>> > >>>>> questions,
>>>> > >>>>>> I
>>>> > >>>>>>> have not seen any concrete plan yet.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> --
>>>> > >>> Best Regards,
>>>> > >>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message