airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amila Jayasekara <thejaka.am...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jGlobus 2.0 sandbox project
Date Thu, 23 May 2013 18:32:30 GMT
Working on it Suresh.

Thanks
Amila


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Amila. Can you help with my proxy [1], I will start on gram and
> gridftp.
>
> Suresh
> [1]  -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/airavata/sandbox/grid-tools/gsi-myproxy-client/
>
> On May 23, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Amila Jayasekara <thejaka.amila@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am in.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amila
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Jglobus 2.0.X seems to be stable enough. I will resume my testing with
> >> 2.0.5 first in the sandbox project. Please volunteer to validate these
> >> tests and once we are happy we can change the trunk as well.
> >>
> >> Suresh
> >>
> >> On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dev's,
> >>>
> >>> I am starting to test jglobus 2.0.5 against the grid tools sandbox
> >> projects. I think recent Unicore provider addition highlight
> discrepancies
> >> in dependencies on jglobus 1.8.x. If the testing in sandbox goes through
> >> fine, we should consider upgrading trunk to jglobus 2.0.x
> >>>
> >>> Suresh
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 22, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> The grid-tools sandbox area is working well for experimental stuff.
I
> >> would like add clients to talk to clusters work load managers like MOAB
> to
> >> further explore. For now I will create a stand alone example, if it
> works
> >> well, I will start a discussion on if we can add it as a provider to
> GFac.
> >> For now, its just a FYI.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Suresh
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/airavata/sandbox/grid-tools/
> >>>>
> >>>> On Nov 9, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Suresh Marru <smarru@iu.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I assume there are no objections to create a sandbox project to
> >> experiment with new libraries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Suresh
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Suresh Marru <smarru@iu.edu>
wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Dev's.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Currently Airavata is relying on jglobus 1.8 for Grid interactions.
> >> The library works ok but has been with some limitations:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * jglobus 1.x version is no longer actively supported as it
was
> >> superseded by jglobus 2.0 effort [1]
> >>>>>> * many dependencies of 1.x are not in maven central and it looks
> like
> >> the time spent on making them all available is not worthwhile. jglobus
> 2.x
> >> has limited dependencies and many are in maven central.
> >>>>>> * jglobus1.x is monolithic with all security, file transfer
and job
> >> management bundled together. Jglobus2.0 refactored these into separate
> >> libraries which will be useful for Airavata going forward.
> >>>>>> * Airavata should take advantage of all the GRAM protocol state
> >> changes and also would need to local job id like features.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If there are are objections, I would like to create a sandbox
area
> >> for and test the jglobus2.0. If it works well, then we will have some
> >> refactoring to do in gfac, but first step is to test the new libraries.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any comments or suggestions?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Suresh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] - http://www.globus.org/toolkit/jglobus/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message