Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81A3ED226 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43068 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 16:38:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 42969 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 16:38:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 42943 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2013 16:38:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:38:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [209.140.118.89]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username smarru, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:38:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Uniqueness of Airavata From: Suresh Marru In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:37:46 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7AD7BA8E-DE69-4EA1-AF72-F0DF85E98EA2@apache.org> References: To: dev@airavata.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Hi Shahani, I totally agree. I think we should all combine the learning into wiki = pages. We can grant karma to a contribution area on wiki for all = students and then later mine all that documentation (vetted by the PMC) = into official website documentation. As Chris pointed out there are = workflow surveys and taxonomies.=20 We can either have elaborate technical reports or short questioner like = [1].=20 Suresh [1] - http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/swf-survey/ On Mar 11, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Shahani Markus Weerawarana = wrote: > HI All, >=20 > There are a few postgraduate research students who have done = significant > literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is time to = harness all > this background reading work that has been done individually and list = the > papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. >=20 > Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your thoughts on the = categories > based on the work you have already completed? >=20 > Shahani >=20 > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA = wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the same project. We = looked >> some research papers science gateways. We found some interesting = facts >> about science gateways in the research paper 'TeraGrid Science = Gateways and >> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 successful science >> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD project has = caused to >> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build science gateways. = And >> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework for Distributed >> Applications and Computational Workflows*' describes about some work = flow >> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. >> And it says these are tools to build science gateways. >> And we came to a conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing = similar >> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And tried to figure = out what >> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We would like to have = some >> good references if we are moving in the wrong path determining what = is >> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. Your help is = really >> appreciated. >>=20 >> Thank You ! >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> [1] >>=20 >> = http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=3D&arnumber=3D4668681&tag=3D1&= url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4= 668681%26tag%3D1 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru = wrote: >>=20 >>> HI Harsha, >>>=20 >>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in which Workflow is a >>> component. A good place to start is to do literature study on = Science >>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of reference papers to make = it >> easy >>> for you to get an understanding on. You will quickly realize the = best way >>> to find out differences in features in open source projects is = cracking >>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, going through = tutorials >>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing lists of the tools = you >>> are comparing against. You identified a good first list, please keep >>> sharing your learnings so future users/students like you will = benefit >> from >>> your contributions. >>>=20 >>> Suresh >>>=20 >>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hi all! >>>> We are doing research on OGC's WPS integration to the = Airavata.During >> the >>>> research we have found some existing work flow generation tools = like >>>> Tarverna, Kepler , >>>> Pegasus and Triana. We would like if we can some details and points >> about >>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks! >>>> -- >>>> *Harsha Kumara* >>>> *Undergraduate* >>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* >>>> *University of Moratuwa* >>>> *Sri Lanka.* >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* > *Computer Scientist* > Visiting Fellow, University of New South Wales, Australia. > Visiting Scientist, Indiana University, USA. > Visiting Lecturer, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.