Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3F51D9DD for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15230 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 22:11:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 15200 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 22:11:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 8668 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2013 22:09:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,579,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="16570720" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,579,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="16572088" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: One workflow running two Application Service From: Raminder Singh In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:09:07 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@airavata.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Pedro for bringing this. I agree, we need to support jobs to = share the working folders in Airavata, at least jobs in same workflow. = Application developers can make sure jobs are not overriding output of = each other. I have similar use case for Dark energy survey project. = Thoughts?=20 Thanks Raminder On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Pedro da Silveira wrote: > Hi Dev, >=20 > I created one workflow where it was calling two Application service, = one at > time. > The first application service runs "pw.x" with 64 cores and the second = runs > "ph.x" also with 64 cores. > My problem is that the location of the "ph.x" has to be same where = "pw.x" > had ran before. >=20 > I noticed that one directory is created for each App service on = Lonestar, > even though they are from the same workflow. Like in my example. >=20 > = AppPhonon_Wed_Jan_30_20_22_13_CST_2013_39895e3b-d9a3-43ae-aba7-ef4abab0b95= 9 > = AppZb3_Wed_Jan_30_20_11_53_CST_2013_6f2cfa93-b503-410f-ab14-2cb02b0ba15c >=20 >=20 > Is there anyway to run both Application Service in just one directory? >=20 >=20 > Thank you, >=20 >=20 > Pedro da Silveira