airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saminda Wijeratne <samin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Do we really have to automatically registering URLs
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:15:30 GMT
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <glahiru@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes I am +1 for that,and give the higher priority for configured url.
>
+1

Saminda

>
> Lahiru
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva <supun06@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > You can keep the current solution and give precedence to property file
> > configurations as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Supun..
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Lahiru Gunathilake <glahiru@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Devs,
> > >
> > > We recently had some issues when we deploy airavata in production with
> > > firewalls and on VMs. We automatically pick the URLs of the services
> > using
> > > Axis2Configuration and get the service names and register them in to
> > > Registry. I wrote this piece of code since it looks handy to do it in
> > that
> > > way. But I think this is an extra headache we always get when we have a
> > > complex network configuration in our deployment environment.
> > >
> > > I think to avoid this we can simply ask users to configure four urls in
> > > repository.properties file, we go and register these urls in to
> registry.
> > > It there are multiple gfac running all will be having same registry url
> > so
> > > we are good to go with out future plans to handle multiple urls.
> > >
> > > Of course we can find some solutions to pick correct url by validating
> > them
> > > but still we are validating from the same deployment environment, not
> > from
> > > out side world. So I think this is an unnecessary feature since its
> just
> > > four urls user have to configure.
> > >
> > > User configure it on repository.properties one time thats it .. if its
> > not
> > > working its deployers fault .. not a fault of Airavata !
> > >
> > > WDYT ? If you agree I can do this fix in to 0.5 release.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Lahiru
> > >
> > > --
> > > System Analyst Programmer
> > > PTI Lab
> > > Indiana University
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Supun Kamburugamuva
> > Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
> > E-mail: supun06@gmail.com;  Mobile: +1 812 369 6762
> > Blog: http://supunk.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> System Analyst Programmer
> PTI Lab
> Indiana University
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message