From users-return-51625-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Wed Jul 3 21:48:03 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DC471180181 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 23:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3649 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2019 21:48:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3617 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2019 21:48:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:48:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B554E180AB9 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:48:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.073 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.073 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=0.1, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lT1KgyGJv9Wz for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Softfail (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=199.38.86.66; helo=n4.nabble.com; envelope-from=mschmeiser@sasktel.net; receiver= Received: from n4.nabble.com (n4.nabble.com [199.38.86.66]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTP id 037AE7E208 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n4.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n4.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36F99BBD6A for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:47:58 -0500 (CDT) From: mschmeiser To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1562190478129-0.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1562101928548-0.post@n4.nabble.com> <1562156392055-0.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Retroactive consumer help MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for the feedback. I apologize for misreading the documentation. Google doesn't do a great job of delineating between 5.X and Artemis, and the ActiveMQ homepage says there's a high-degree of feature parity between the two, so I assumed that Artemis supported retroactive queues. I have demonstrated the use case requirements by using a Last Value Queue with non-destructive consumers. However, that has raised a new issue I spent the better part of today investigating. I made a new topic for it here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Retroactive-consumer-help-td4751391.html Thanks again! -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html