activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Federation vs cluster
Date Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:51:16 GMT
I'm just getting familiar with this feature, but my understanding is that
it wouldn't provide connection failover. I believe you'd still need to
configure HA for that functionality.


Justin

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:38 PM artemisn00b <prahlad.misra@nokia.com>
wrote:

> The 3 servers are VMs. So, federation might work as well. Currently, I'm
> using a cluster and forwarding all messages to servers with consumers.
> Unfortunately, using a cluster by itself without HA means that I have to
> tear down the connection and create a new one, on every broker failure. So
> I
> was wondering if federated address would be a better fit for that. There
> are
> a lot of experienced people to help me out as well, that's not a problem!
> :)
>
> Would it be possible for you to say if it handles broker failures in a
> specific way?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message