activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ HA on failover topic mode
Date Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:49:02 GMT
You might also look at Christian Posta's blog post to see if any of those
ideas and techniques would be of use for your situation:
http://blog.christianposta.com/activemq/speeding-up-activemq-persistent-messaging-performance-by-25x/

Tim

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018, 11:45 AM Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu wrote:

> I've never run the broker in that mode, but I'd expect that one major
> determiner of your throughput would be the speed at which the disk can do
> the frequent, small flushes to disk. I'd expect you to see the best
> performance on a locally-attached SSD with low write latency, but it's
> possible that you might get similar or better performance in certain
> configurations involving fast storage arrays, so YMMV.
>
> Also, reducing network latency between the producer and the broker could
> show a significant improvement if what you have now isn't performant, so
> you could pursue that.
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 2:03 AM PedroRP <pedro.ramirez@techonrails.com
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim!
>>
>> Thank you very much for your answer!
>>
>> Yes, I was using non-durable subscription on my topic. When I changed to
>> durable subscription, It didn't lose messages if I use sync sends. The
>> main
>> problem now is the sending response time. It spends too much time sending
>> messages. Is there any way to accelerate it without async sends?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message