From users-return-50652-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Thu Nov 1 16:32:52 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B26F180652 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:32:51 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 88146 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2018 15:32:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 88134 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2018 15:32:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:32:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 502B5C1376 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:32:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.203 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49lMPJCqFGTg for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BE8BD5F27B for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id g59-v6so5110084plb.10 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 08:32:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PVm8ZZqPmE9XPP0J/Fc3COs9Ubzf+Vm+F06eSydtW4I=; b=X45tJP4eeD0Tow0CtTQie/1XSh81eZWZa6E8UVMUhOQI9RRNz81R4MW0Jtg7VqYzCZ Scg5rE3SVYU7ClzHdOKtgtFv022aY3DH/ck1wLQYuCuMubtYB2O4DfEPDXBKIpKkKL6f ShzLYtjf3f9GZfxHdiPLQjby61XEZ2964AlrNzTqBTJMfTv7O2j7zbaoJhM1B2gwpoFg iBpJzLlGg4Bs22c+pJTtzTVs1Z9s6AXzu+73bsVSD1eKeA+QgLLDeS3WtxIm4IUih5QD ZDdQmXYnVGeBZeIAx8oSx1Go1EKfvNymlKqeJRIGPpbD+MnfMC74CVbKQArFAP74RriS NNrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PVm8ZZqPmE9XPP0J/Fc3COs9Ubzf+Vm+F06eSydtW4I=; b=uUa+0ka+SMpJV+P7fK6mfQCATyszGwMHp8P6SJmMcG0jrvrZejczXJxHGmhT6I83wB AqBxpnGYw1m7MSwNNgpVE7if7b0UVgLRzIfTJOSM8GPRUb2JDQ5KoP7VujMWcAvUgxxV 3ODkibmNPEhcqaTjY/L44i6kmWO5ICZzsfEjX6eS6jbssFgr//oUHJqtpqVfZ4IYTq+/ FioKcD/eQyMQdZH8qgWC+Mw+hFVWfWfRFlD+dN2TNTamVomDLrZugpufIkNRALn/c6j4 5koD1P3O0UcaXwdig42fY0CoSGi9n8BO3mzoBh+UkwG5z8dY8IbqkVo8Lxx4++4vxKB7 odAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ9ZEakF2DkHmpcKTr7sh4LZDK2AKGf4Qsj1EDWDSnpviWYDeh4 Cy8AZZ4Id4eWHX6XvdtntxPj3YqipAFx/pYV4jCyCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cPzWLUK5UHLug+YA32xBcfy0qCyK+if2pCqN+zOdnfd+hv4cYcFc3LzfCqrqpt9LYBH2kvBDFwpt4MCbOngzw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4623:: with SMTP id o32-v6mr8004094pld.187.1541086365684; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 08:32:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1540924904203-0.post@n4.nabble.com> <1541017903660-0.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clebert Suconic Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:32:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Duplicate Messages To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" @Justin: They are using 1.6.2 as the server. and 2.6.2 as they client. So he needs to set the prefixes at the connection factory I think. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:32 AM Justin Bertram wrote: > > In the default broker.xml since Artemis 2.5.0 you'll see a comment like > this above the acceptors: > > > > This is also noted in the documentation for the 2.5.0 release [1]. > > Have you configured these prefixes when observing the problem? > > > Justin > > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/versions.html#250 > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:26 AM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > On that case you must use prefixes on your 2.6.2 clients. > > > > > > Do you really need to mix 1.x and 2.x on this? I would keep things > > aligned on this case. > > > > > > But this is definitely related to your prefixes. When the client > > connects to the older version a new queue is being created, and that's > > causing your duplicate. It seems a configuration issue. > > > > > > If you really need to mix the versions.. you will need to play with > > prefixes. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:31 PM ldebello wrote: > > > > > > Hi Clebert, > > > > > > Thanks for your response, the issue is the other way around. > > > > > > - I have a Artemis Server 1.5.5 (In Cluster) using exclusive diverts. If > > the > > > client use the version 2.6.2 the message got duplicate. > > > > > > Let me know if I can provide more details on the issue. > > > > > > Thanks & Best Regards, > > > Luis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > -- Clebert Suconic