From users-return-49878-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Thu Apr 19 17:19:54 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FCBE180638 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 27797 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2018 15:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27780 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2018 15:19:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:19:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DB1E4C0A97 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:19:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.736 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.736 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBksHviDD5lH for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n4.nabble.com (n4.nabble.com [162.253.133.72]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 92ED75FAEB for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mben.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n4.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2862C1A32ADB6 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:19:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:19:48 -0700 (MST) From: johgre To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1524151188162-0.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1523565833348-0.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1523565833348-0.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: VirtualTopic Consumers in NOB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit After some more digging it seem to be the failover transport that might be the culprit. When posting a msg directly to one node tcp://server_1:61616 the filter is applied correctly. But using the failover transport when posting the msg failover:(tcp://server_1:61616,tcp://server_2:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=100 results in the msg being forwarded from the VirtualTopic to the Queue, with the selector *only* applied randomly. Don't understand how the transport can have such an impact on the delivery of msg to correct queues? The NOB config is according to: and correspondingly on the other node. So, in addition it's a master/slave-setup. The setup seem to work fine, but during the tests the slaves have been shut down. Creating a Queue (tied to the VirtualTopic) on one node, automatically gets created on the other node. VirtualTopic config: In addition the virtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin is used, as mentioned. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html