From users-return-49736-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Mon Mar 26 07:17:29 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A470A180649 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37850 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2018 05:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 37802 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2018 05:17:25 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 05:17:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 783121A0972 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 05:17:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.81 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.81 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=1.999] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9q1om0bzUPd for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 05:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com (mail-wr0-f180.google.com [209.85.128.180]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B516F5F4E4 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 05:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m13so4183353wrj.5 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:17:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=Yk4WNBcqUjSM/73SWTpY9aPI+6mzDiZcirbEc2ZjEBE=; b=QZ3g7nrPKIw/d/LcpF1fVKcBkns3lMGDn9JMIz8gsEP0H1TL4E5btygRxy2EX6surh W87BiqCpp3ZHpzMMVnAr6iJcveHpsRRVUItmQfc7XZ50iQToTlqRXQA2jgzyLL9Fb2Ro eGsdA4zY59HB0bh21PJpJaV2TFqLCset2+eYWOJfEfpqhUUaBzISYE7QqBpdFTVcHHCg ZmapfMy0Kdx4Kx8OGjumkuWstcTU++uwiB1GdQsay/ZD6qlqw4nvQVO/QihBFXZldzdH lPwoo8vh7Ql4zQBu1RhqEFDkzsMXvruIBVj5cDVr6z+avufc7CoemLC9sotYsXHuPpvH knqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yk4WNBcqUjSM/73SWTpY9aPI+6mzDiZcirbEc2ZjEBE=; b=et8CBc7qrUOgVIgbFLLGDnU13Zxnas3g+DFUiKLVZmXxsFeVQ4ytvHfLzJ5j8vH4Pd cyiIjWdo+p39SR9MrxAU9HW3K0HCMHpO18+TfsoKCkTkFUY+XsXT65CbPtuyCmQOJdK9 OxKvN5H1EuCvgCUHvb7/Vxik/eAXYlQAPbkNDm41xgyH/48tYRAGVa3E62+j1PiZgzNc 50WmxjDvkrgVvw4BWdTCGXOE6qrSDXTTS45fO7UVZB0obE8k3QV/X5HMlIhQgL+m9jTl 7ViQGpI0XHioocd2OwSHZxm/jL3SFEZezVRjADOYO+ooURC/AZgLTVxE8rLWcdvP09Ne z1cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F2ohj2WBVHsOSvoDTp9xjgfm5g+bN7HKJcWX+vSIMcAJ5hLOXD 3I6NgLR5fbRNkEqIhJn8tYFJVQarRZmuDGb51vg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELspJ163vaFklF9ZgWtL1tl5x+PctmrIz4VQPqkl1j8yUjVyV1IiZuwfqwEIjKrP6VkWTfMla/jHoxQlgohSPvc= X-Received: by 10.223.197.139 with SMTP id m11mr28541499wrg.198.1522041441489; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:17:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.135.89 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:17:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1521718120483-0.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1521718120483-0.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Tim Bain Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:17:01 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: spfB6OEP8hVpGpT1JgYCNXV_OVs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Older Message Not Consumed(Stay Untouched in queue) Newer Messages consumed To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082418dc7416ed056849e3de" --089e082418dc7416ed056849e3de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Do the consumers on that queue use selectors? If so, is it possible that the selectors for all active consumers simply don't match those messages? Does the problem persist after you restart the broker? Or are all messages consumed once the process is restarted? In earlier versions there were some problems where messages would not get dispatched due to a bug but would be handled correctly after a restart, though my memory is that those problems were primarily in the 5.8-5.10 timeframe and I don't remember having seen reports of them in the more recent versions. Delayed/scheduled messages wouldn't show up in the web console until their scheduled time has arrived, so I don't think that's relevant to the behavior you're seeing. Tim On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:28 AM, ajayvaghelanw wrote: > Hello, > > I am using ActiveMQ 5.15.0 and there are multiple queues in system which > helps to communicate my system for each queue there is an individual > system. > > But, sometimes in a queue multiple messages of any random time period got > stuck but after that time period newer messages is consumed but older > remained in queue. > > I have added delay configuration in ActiveMQ. (Is it the reason??) > > I have tried to identify the cause but not come to any conclusion. > > I have seen that ActiveMQ has similar kind of problem in version older than > 5.9. > > > Please help me out. > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User- > f2341805.html > --089e082418dc7416ed056849e3de--