activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question about rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException (AMQ-3166)
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:42:09 GMT
XA transactions?
normally the transaction is on the session and connection... so any async
call will complete before the commit.. unless maybe nio is mixing this up
some.
do you have some code that will show the rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException case
where the tx is null.

There is a test case that can provide the basis for some experiments:
AMQ3166Test



On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 14:38 alprausch77 <joachim.glink@dematic.com> wrote:

> Hello Gary.
> Thanks for your reply.
> I already tried the rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException. But this one only works
> if
> the transaction still exists when the error in the async send happens.
> But if the TX is already finished, than there is no such action because the
> code which looks up the transaction returns null (naturally) and therfore
> can´t do a rollback.
>
> That´s why I asked if there is some way to add a synchronization on the TX
> commit on the asynch outcome...
>
> Some time ago I also tested out the preallocation strategies but found no
> real performance differences between those. I think this has to do with the
> Windows file system which we are using; on Unix based systems this seems to
> have more of an effect.
>
> I haven´t tried the ackCompaction yet. But if I understand it correctly I
> don´t think this will have much influence either because we aren´t doing
> much bulk processing. In each transaction there are only a few messages
> received / send.
>
> But I will have a look at this and also to Artemis.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message