Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2195200D59 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:06:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BAAD1160C09; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 33686160BF2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:06:09 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 62486 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2017 22:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 62475 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2017 22:06:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 80B1DC3F4C for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.285 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.285 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXARwQKuDisa for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n4.nabble.com (n4.nabble.com [162.253.133.72]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id D38EE5F296 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mben.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n4.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035D01718B2AF for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:06:04 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:06:04 -0700 (MST) From: Erwim Dondorp To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1512943564010-0.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: your ActiveMQ network of brokers experience MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:06:09 -0000 Hello, I've implemented ActiveMQ with a distributed application using the Network-of-Brokers (see http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html). Now I'm trying to figure out whether Network-of-Brokers is a common pattern; and on which scale it is actually used with other applications out there. Can you please boast about your Network-of-ActiveMQ-brokers? For me, a rough indication about the tolopogy (star, mesh, line, etc) and the number of brokers will do. thx! Erwin -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html