activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap
Date Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:22:47 GMT
Also, I should add that if a bunch of people think it's better to rename
Artemis to ActiveMQ 6 then that is fine too.  My opinion about keeping it
as Artemis is it would be easier but if people feel strongly about making
it ActiveMQ 6 and want to do the work to rename everything that is fine
with me as well.

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it's pretty clear at this point that Artemis is the future.
> However, I don't know that renaming it to ActiveMQ 6 makes any sense as it
> would be a lot of work and more confusion.
>
> My opinion would be to just have the roadmap say Artemis is the future and
> recommended broker and drop plans to have an ActiveMQ 6 release.  We can
> just keep using the current versioning that Artemis is already using.
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2017 10:04 AM, Jiri Danek wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ultimately I believe the decision is in the hands of the ActiveMQ PMC
>>>> [1].
>>>>
>>>> Where can I find a list of PMC members for ActiveMQ? The closest I got
>>> to
>>> it is http://activemq.apache.org/team.html
>>>
>> The info for that is here:
>> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?activemq
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message