activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
Subject Re: new to ActiveMq - is JDBC only the backend storage option ?
Date Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:38:57 GMT
It's not clear to me if you're asking about the ActiveMQ 5.x broker or the
ActiveMQ Artemis broker.  Christian answered your question in the context
of 5.x.  For Artemis the default storage is a set of journal files that
would work fine on a SAN.


Justin

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Christian Schneider <
chris@die-schneider.net> wrote:

> The default storage backend is kahadb. Kahadb works with simple files. So
> it is suitable for a SAN. Make sure though that the SAN provides a good
> shared file lock. This is required for master  / slave mode.
>
> JDBC is typically a lot slower than kahadb. So I would rather not use jdbc.
>
> Christian
>
> 2017-10-11 16:45 GMT+02:00 uraees <raeez@hotmail.com>:
>
> > New to ActiveMq and trying to learn - is JDBC only the back-end storage
> > option ? our firm mostly encourages to use a SAN file based back-end
> > storage
> > if possible; is that option available for this product ?  and is there
> any
> > performance implications vs JDBC storage!.
> >
> > Also does the product need to be deployed in an app server ? or does it
> has
> > a stand alone run-time  ?
> >
> > thanks
> > Raees
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> > f2341805.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
> <https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e
> 46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.liquid-reality.de>
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message