Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1504976832579-0.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1504517355395-0.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAKF+bsqtScsdhTD-34+3yZAgmMR8Rkgnj7OpzKkxRBksvo=Bhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+kE=RY82563Ujp_jncyWWXyOPwzi77YAjppbpKuWZxqcvFSg@mail.gmail.com> <1504976832579-0.post@n4.nabble.com>
From: Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 13:34:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF+kE=S3N1aSLyMZMYPK=r+JN6+30JpPbRszTKp-1-9Q17E85Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication and two slaves results in
 broken/none backup
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cd3fc3088ff0558c5f078"
archived-at: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 18:34:17 -0000

--001a113cd3fc3088ff0558c5f078
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I will hopefully get a chance to look at it at some point.  Contributions
are, of course, always welcome.


Justin

On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, martk <123martin@web.de> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Yes, that's exactly the same behavior. Thank you. Would be great to be
> fixed
> in one of the next releases.
>
>
> @Clebert: I think that's the benefit: replication with nothing shared.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> f2341805.html
>

--001a113cd3fc3088ff0558c5f078--