activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Artemis cluster and message acknowledgement
Date Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:08:02 GMT
Your configuration looks OK to me.  Do you have a reproducible test-case
for this scenario?


Justin

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:24 AM, gkocur <grzegorz.kocur@softwaremill.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for your reply.
> What you described is exactly what I was expecting - current message count
> close to 0.
> I can see the number of journal files is growing, so sooner or later I'll
> be
> out of disk space.
> The cluster configuration is pretty simple - it's symmetric cluster with
> static configuration.
> Cluster config on server1:
>
>      <cluster-connections>
>          <cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
>             <connector-ref>amqp-broker-0</connector-ref>
>             <retry-interval>500</retry-interval>
>             <use-duplicate-detection>true</use-duplicate-detection>
>             <message-load-balancing>ON_DEMAND</message-load-balancing>
>             <max-hops>1</max-hops>
>             <static-connectors>
>                <connector-ref>amqp-broker-1</connector-ref>
>             </static-connectors>
>          </cluster-connection>
>       </cluster-connections>
>
> Cluster config on server2:
>
>       <cluster-connections>
>          <cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
>             <connector-ref>amqp-broker-1</connector-ref>
>             <retry-interval>500</retry-interval>
>             <use-duplicate-detection>true</use-duplicate-detection>
>             <message-load-balancing>ON_DEMAND</message-load-balancing>
>             <max-hops>1</max-hops>
>             <static-connectors>
>                <connector-ref>amqp-broker-0</connector-ref>
>             </static-connectors>
>          </cluster-connection>
>       </cluster-connections>
>
>
> Is it ok?
>
>
> Justin Bertram wrote
> > Queues named like "$.artemis.internal.sf." are internal queues used to
> > move
> > messages between nodes for things like server-side message load-balancing
> > or message redistribution.  As long as the cluster is formed properly
> then
> > messages should not accumulate there but should land there for just a
> > moment before they are moved across the cluster bridge to the other node.
> > I would expect the "Messages Added" stat to go up, but I would expect the
> > "Message Count" to stay close to 0.
> >
> > Are you seeing any functional impact?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:03 AM, gkocur &lt;
>
> > grzegorz.kocur@
>
> > &gt;
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a newbie question.
> >> I'm playing with artemis clustering, and have simple setup like this:
> >>
> >> pruducer----artemis-server1----consumer1
> >>                   |
> >>                   artemis-server2----consumer2
> >>
> >> Messages are balanced to server2 exactly as described in documentation.
> >> The
> >> only issue I have with this setup is message acknowledgement - "Message
> >> count" for queue
> >> "$.artemis.internal.sf.ersules.f2a284aa-9c3b-11e7-96f2-062013112720"
> (so
> >> sent to server2) is growing, and "Messages acknowledged" is always 0. Is
> >> it
> >> expected behaviour? Or do I miss some configuration?
> >>
> >> Thank you for any help with this.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Grzegorz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> >> f2341805.html
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> f2341805.html
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message