Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578DC2004A1 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 55EAF16B8D2; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E8CD16B8D0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 42341 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2017 20:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 42330 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2017 20:46:26 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 68E5FC0169 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTvU2VHOdovH for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www83.your-server.de (www83.your-server.de [213.133.104.83]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B90B85FC8A for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.73.41.143] (helo=[192.168.178.23]) by www83.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dkz17-0007gH-8N; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:46:17 +0200 To: users@activemq.apache.org From: "Oliver B. Fischer" Subject: JBoss AMQ versus Artemis AMQ Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:46:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.99.2/23706/Thu Aug 24 14:41:44 2017) archived-at: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:46:30 -0000 Dear all, my colleagues and I are going to build a new distributed system based on Apache Artemis. Now we have to answer the question to ourselves if we should go for JBoss AMQ with support contract or should we use Apache Artemis directly. Is there a good reason to choose JBoss AMQ? Would be nice to have your opinions on this. Best, Oliver -- N Oliver B. Fischer A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany P +49 30 44793251 M +49 178 7903538 E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net S oliver.b.fischer J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org X http://xing.to/obf