Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B5200CE6 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:36:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5A5C71609A7; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B0F121609C9 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:36:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73572 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2017 12:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 73060 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2017 12:36:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:36:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E903818070A for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:36:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 6.044 X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.044 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_OBF=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vNPPDp3XjTa for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 01FB15FE4D for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q25so6321459uah.1 for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:36:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=s2/KEL8ne5xWU00f4UQnNIubzSDSyNc6ZTQbZQLc6TA=; b=YAu6HpxfClPYjov+K4m9YZfQjX8M5ToegZHKt9UbVuedXPfm+gZMqF2RUFkhC2syii K8FjJgezjc19nHvCRO79GOeHJl9PzF7sgy1N/G0LpuNdUcP3MN5y6eZH+1dwMMde1MWG r7KkDiEO+bszW+zt5mquJgHXl/qPgAfKS8kD3/PTy/f3lVQjzRzz9EHhs3knksMsPVSA kyIA8HdtfN1hB8HA1HaJz4Afx0hz9cKt6CvK1nmUhjB4AcyaCaomVvWuh8ZPQjDzoQOo qLQsXQu8Jq3Q+VLW/jxb2XEHVbzmO5VU8URUGE4eg3/lOh1nCuxIxxKg6N+2BjUQclzn /+HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s2/KEL8ne5xWU00f4UQnNIubzSDSyNc6ZTQbZQLc6TA=; b=WhSdbCF1qwvWAUbEDOwbdzGT2PxRC7xEo8ewQLb6KdkSqY8q1Etdl06zPYbMyso4Pd CcYGGZEdEi6qBAtBupXEYHHUwzYv4FDR5sgv7hgN4tXBS1gS6kkjLIDjkAARPbY9jwZq 1MeQSQA618caD24gzO7ExnQ9kj0n2Zyjfqn1mZQVbvlVvosi+Q8qOkxVr00Zi0xj/366 VHG8un/Cu3KySO7v4gIquglKxRruPjfn60sI5fRNT39M+6Nb4levKUlE5kV0chE19QjE 0mpZk03+N5l8AV4uIrXmjI4JQgTAYy3GU8SyRCwVZvrEHjHppKBjCCvo3lAC0OkGa+3Y LLcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113FhtsEMs5M4B7AW4rjha2d66qNLlMGL0OtoaWtpkQbyxilIJl9 KoHkyBwdSYkS1zf5JlWCfh6il167jQ== X-Received: by 10.159.48.16 with SMTP id h16mr13984548uab.102.1501590962211; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:36:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.131.216 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.131.216 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1501581422920-4729102.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <09555B06-3A9A-4D48-8728-AEB2E708BEB2@gmail.com> <1492075202229-4724925.post@n4.nabble.com> <1492402728698-4724978.post@n4.nabble.com> <1492510685863-4725022.post@n4.nabble.com> <1493000695653-4725184.post@n4.nabble.com> <1494404675416-4725874.post@n4.nabble.com> <1501581422920-4729102.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Tim Bain Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 06:36:01 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aWGMBP-2uPvdo9xeOKdGXWq0KVI Message-ID: Subject: Re: org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport - Transport Connection to: tcp://XX.XX.XXX.XXX:5445 failed: java.io.EOFException To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e24aae691360555b0636c" archived-at: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:36:16 -0000 --f403045e24aae691360555b0636c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That's great news. Sorry for never responding to your last two emails; I still had them flagged to come back to, but nothing in the thread dump gave me any idea of what was going on. Now that you've determined that the behavior was driven by external forces rather than something within the broker, that makes complete sense. Tim On Aug 1, 2017 3:57 AM, "Siebo" wrote: > Hi, > > Finally, my problem was solved. It was a mistake from load balance tool > which made continuous command call to check activemq alive or not. By some > reasons, it made the number of thread increase by time and activemq die > when > it exceeded maximum threads. > Thank you all (especially Tim) did help me a lot in resolving this trouble. > > Thanks and best regards, > Siebo > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/org-apache-activemq-broker-TransportConnection-Transport- > Transport-Connection-to-tcp-XX-XX-XXX-XXX-5n-tp4722840p4729102.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --f403045e24aae691360555b0636c--