Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183A8200CE0 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 16A9616C71D; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 33BC916C71B for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:24:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 58436 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2017 10:24:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 57335 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2017 10:24:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8FDC4180AE7 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.822 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.822 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=me.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLl4rysbXgAi for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com (pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com [17.142.241.8]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C15F160FC8 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com by pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) id <0OV800A00KTJDD00@pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com> for users@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:23:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=04042017; t=1503656635; bh=hpsNndBxRhv8FEotEe+SbZ1W+r7T4NPGowCJtYyZkPs=; h=Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:From:Date:Message-id:To; b=uLccrVdRFZY4+a6lb4EcLo4zTGtxZW1/Ck6DbLQGoLRUyiv8TFJirUYOevB6JWc12 L6vU0Jy5lkFBhaka7dg5wpzn6lmKVGOtjYucOqjaNk4kNrZbQPwt/vVrdCwNv5MBwy AzT+QC1Y2qgE7Hwykfy7T1L1/LdekXOgnHR1czu57mHAeMh1uSWdk1OHD5t2e4QCvG yHaKT0u85pVdekuO66Yebeln3qOWBLB+ao6F23RVXwKMHQYA4suvI0aY8YSx4A42iY X8SrklluA5KZx8e3qlcn0/Fh6d2vkDPJe/o4NDknRcxCv2VEfu9j9C9LUcn1E71yim t/lXObkZ5W3pw== Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0OV80022WKVSBZ30@pv33p33im-asmtp001.me.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:23:54 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-08-25_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1708250150 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: JBoss AMQ versus Artemis AMQ From: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_Andr=C3=A9_Pearce?= X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60) In-reply-to: <25427fe4-36b4-ce5e-f5d0-ebe932e0c76f@swe-blog.net> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:23:51 +0100 Cc: users@activemq.apache.org Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <68C19199-D9C8-45CF-AD03-80D8BC8E4847@me.com> References: <4B53F4F7-9941-44EA-8961-2CFFB487B179@me.com> <25427fe4-36b4-ce5e-f5d0-ebe932e0c76f@swe-blog.net> To: "Oliver B. Fischer" archived-at: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:08 -0000 Hi Oliver=20 In that case I'd suggest when speaking with a vendor you ask them to provide= contacts of organisations willing to discuss the benefits they've had with y= ou, via other channels. Cheers Mike Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Aug 2017, at 10:44, Oliver B. Fischer wro= te: >=20 > Hi Mike, >=20 > you are right. We are aware of pros and cons you mentioned. The actual rea= son for asking here on the list is/was to find people who know if it is wort= h to pay for JBoss AMQ or not. Such a decision is not easy in our environmen= t because of the consequences. >=20 > But thanks a lot for your answer >=20 > Oliver >=20 >=20 >> Am 24.08.17 um 23:28 schrieb Michael Andr=C3=A9 Pearce: >> Hi Oliver, >>=20 >> Rather than answer this for a specific vendor as Apache spaces are meant t= o be vendor neutral e.g. shouldn't be pushing /selling their products. You w= ill find though on activemq site a list of known vendors providing such serv= ices. >>=20 >> This is the same as probably most Apache open source products where comme= rcial vendors sell support. Good other examples are the Apache Hadoop projec= ts with Hadoop vendors, Apache Kafka and Apache Ignite all having vendors ba= cking those projects. >>=20 >> In general the benefits of Apache Open Source is that you can use the pro= duct un-restricted and at any scale. >> Like wise most Apache projects are very active with most critical issues b= eing patched quite quickly. >>=20 >> User forums are great places to ask questions or discuss issues, where ot= her users or the devs on the projects help each other. >>=20 >> You of course can always fork and self patch as well. Some large companie= s go this route as well as the other end of the scale with tech start ups. >>=20 >> The benefits of vendors that provide support for open source project, is t= hat typically they will have committers on the project or developers who are= at least very active, this means they know the code and in cases of critica= l issue obviously you have them to call upon with commercial SLAs. >>=20 >> Like wise typically vendors will fork the project and bundle a project wi= th some additional extras or bundle a couple of projects together as a singl= e product package. >>=20 >> Another part is obviously they tend to provide long term support for part= icular versions, if required. >>=20 >> To understand further what specific vendors offer obviously it's best to v= isit their websites or contact them direct. >>=20 >> Cheers >> Mike >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 24 Aug 2017, at 21:46, Oliver B. Fischer w= rote: >>>=20 >>> Dear all, >>>=20 >>> my colleagues and I are going to build a new distributed system based on= Apache Artemis. >>>=20 >>> Now we have to answer the question to ourselves if we should go for JBos= s AMQ with support contract or should we use Apache Artemis directly. >>>=20 >>> Is there a good reason to choose JBoss AMQ? >>>=20 >>> Would be nice to have your opinions on this. >>>=20 >>> Best, >>>=20 >>> Oliver >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> --=20 >>> N Oliver B. Fischer >>> A Sch=C3=B6nhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >>> P +49 30 44793251 >>> M +49 178 7903538 >>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net >>> S oliver.b.fischer >>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org >>> X http://xing.to/obf >>>=20 >=20 > --=20 > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Sch=C3=B6nhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net > S oliver.b.fischer > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org > X http://xing.to/obf >=20