Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 02:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tamas1 <tamas.reinhardt@i-new.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1501578970003-4729101.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a9534af-9efa-2591-693d-f5edf37b318f@gmail.com>
References: <1501168890154-4728967.post@n4.nabble.com> <fc39e0cb-b1ed-cf06-ef4c-f78659a31a7b@gmail.com> <1501497688856-4729057.post@n4.nabble.com> <1a9534af-9efa-2591-693d-f5edf37b318f@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ActiveMQ-CPP] "backup=true" does not work with failover
 transport
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:16:42 -0000

Thank you for your answer. Having no other option, I have used it with
"backup=false".

I use two ActiveMQ servers in network of brokers setup for realtime, non
persistent messaging. Throughput is up to several thousands of messages /
second on a couple of queues parallel. If it worked, I would be interested
in to see if "backup=true" causes a significant decrease in the time of
failover.

---

Loosely related topic: When I shut down the "primary" broker, messages in
the queues (which are in memory) are obviously lost. (Persistent messaging
doesn't make sense because of a very low "TTL".) Is there any way to get (or
trigger) producers to reconnect to the "secondary" (or backup) broker before
the "primary" broker shuts down? If there is no producing on the "to be shut
down broker" and remaining messages are consumed before the shutdown then
the failover would not cause messages to be lost.


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-backup-true-does-not-work-with-failover-transport-tp4728967p4729101.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.