activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Intercept mqtt client connection
Date Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:20:59 GMT
When the broker was first developed it only supported the core protocol.
The client/server would exchange objects which
implement org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.Packet.
Interceptors would intercept packet implementations.  That terminology has
stuck when referring to other protocols even though those protocols don't
use core packets.

Hope that helps...


Justin

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jiri Danek <jdanek@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > I believe it's because it's not implemented.
> >
> > Agreed.  It looks to me like only the publish packets are intercepted
>
>
> I've been wondering, why are they called "packets"? They are not the IP
> packets, so why reuse the word? I haven't seen this answered anywhere.
> --
> Jiří Daněk
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message