Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKF+bspsiH0V-Fwon17sgSdHi9e-Og6HV5Z+vG4awAOYyLVV3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1501082187962-4728934.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAF+kE=TCgHAiM+1xLOMES9ekkM3eEj754v+gbnufk_RVnzzjaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1501176837821-4728978.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAKF+bsrNetJrXYpjjtDsZ2aVvEWk_QNWzReFTMHsJU23t-WTgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+kE=RYzPBuZ47n=iTsTHkmdZgDoPUttOkdpg=m28hMEF7JSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKF+bspsiH0V-Fwon17sgSdHi9e-Og6HV5Z+vG4awAOYyLVV3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:44:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF+kE=QSTKL7nXzQkuDKSPj+rQqhNEqAhcgFXygrPj2hfvEQsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Artemis: AMQP bridges
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dd1747ec677055550f495"
archived-at: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:44:48 -0000

--001a113dd1747ec677055550f495
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Clebert, are you changing the core bridge to support Artemis' internal AMQP
message representation or are you implementing a bridge that uses the AMQP
protocol?


Justin

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:07 PM Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the explanation.  That seems like it would be a good use-case
> > for Camel bridging between two JMS providers.
> >
>
> Regardless I will have to fix the core bridge to load balance amqp as well.
>
>
>
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Check back in a week.  I'm working on it.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:34 PM adagys <andrius.dagys@r3.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, I'll have a look at Dispatch.
> > > >
> > > > The use-case is a distributed ledger platform, where we have a
> > > peer-to-peer
> > > > network of nodes operated by different parties. Each node runs an
> > Artemis
> > > > broker, and maintains queues for messages to other nodes, which get
> > > > forwarded using core bridges. We'd like to support a scenario where
> > some
> > > of
> > > > the nodes run a non-Artemis AMQP broker, and it's still possible to
> > > > interoperate (the non-Artemis broker might also require some
> additional
> > > > bridging support).
> > > >
> > > > For more context:
> > > > https://docs.corda.net/key-concepts-ecosystem.html#network-structure
> > > > <https://docs.corda.net/key-concepts-ecosystem.html#
> network-structure>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-AMQP-
> > > bridges-tp4728934p4728978.html
> > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

--001a113dd1747ec677055550f495--