activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Artemis: AMQP bridges
Date Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:41:07 GMT
In that case, your fix (while needed) wouldn't help in this use-case since
they're trying to connect between nodes via AMQP.

I think either Qpid Dispatch Router or a Camel have the most promise at
this point.


Justin

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If an AMQP message is going through the bridge. I would embed the wrap the
> message Before send.  Unwrap at receiving.
>
> That is the protocol is still core.  But it would wrap non core messages
> instead of converting it.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:44 PM Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Clebert, are you changing the core bridge to support Artemis' internal
> AMQP
> > message representation or are you implementing a bridge that uses the
> AMQP
> > protocol?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:07 PM Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the explanation.  That seems like it would be a good
> > use-case
> > > > for Camel bridging between two JMS providers.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Regardless I will have to fix the core bridge to load balance amqp as
> > well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > > clebert.suconic@gmail.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Check back in a week.  I'm working on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:34 PM adagys <andrius.dagys@r3.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, I'll have a look at Dispatch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The use-case is a distributed ledger platform, where we have
a
> > > > > peer-to-peer
> > > > > > network of nodes operated by different parties. Each node runs
an
> > > > Artemis
> > > > > > broker, and maintains queues for messages to other nodes, which
> get
> > > > > > forwarded using core bridges. We'd like to support a scenario
> where
> > > > some
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the nodes run a non-Artemis AMQP broker, and it's still possible
> to
> > > > > > interoperate (the non-Artemis broker might also require some
> > > additional
> > > > > > bridging support).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For more context:
> > > > > >
> > https://docs.corda.net/key-concepts-ecosystem.html#network-structure
> > > > > > <https://docs.corda.net/key-concepts-ecosystem.html#
> > > network-structure>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-AMQP-
> > > > > bridges-tp4728934p4728978.html
> > > > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message