Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
From: Helge Waastad <helge@waastad.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:37:36 +0200
Subject: Re: artemis 2.2.0 logging disaster
Message-Id: <D46D0B3C-501A-4B60-B13C-705DB67387C6@waastad.org>
References: <1496393053.6455.18.camel@waastad.org> <FD59B700-43BE-47F4-89F1-206A8EBE6FFF@me.com> <AD90AE81-B30E-4F64-90AD-FD13372066E0@me.com> <CAKF+bspRs8TsbzPORXt==QVW=FsGMXco4pf0pFAa9HC=Pos2YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPVVMa8-DGbsKaGpUXP6XSq0Bfme12voEfbRqeSuyKTOqw59ng@mail.gmail.com> <1496470728195-4726986.post@n4.nabble.com> <F96C83D2-5058-4699-AC90-A51CCF76226C@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <F96C83D2-5058-4699-AC90-A51CCF76226C@me.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
archived-at: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 07:37:44 -0000

Hi,
We do dev in prod=F0=9F=98=89

I actually since posting built the 2.2.0-SN from yesterday and I'll see if i=
t makes any difference.

I'll add the detection option if needed

Thx.

/hw

Sendt fra min iPhone

> Den 3. jun. 2017 kl. 09.19 skrev Michael Andr=C3=A9 Pearce <michael.andre.=
pearce@me.com>:
>=20
> If you have the ability (not sure if this is a dev or a prod env) as clebe=
rt mentions at there are some changes in master for MQTT protocol since 2.1.=
0 release, if you have any chance to build and deploy master?
>=20
> On the netty front there's a system property=20
> -Dio.netty.leakDetection.level=3Dadvanced
> If you add this and rerun, this will output if there's any leak. To elimin=
ate or prove that one.
>=20
> Cheers
> Mike
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
>> On 3 Jun 2017, at 07:18, hwaastad <helge@waastad.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi guys,
>> and thx for answering.
>>=20
>> a quick summary of my setup:
>> 1. Its 2.1.0 so I'm not running any snapshot
>> 2. The load is pretty constant.(performance checks from nagios), approx
>> 1.1GB data per month, 2.5 mill entries over MQTT.
>> 3. We've been running activemq with virtualdestinations (mqtt->jms) earli=
er
>> and never had any issues.
>> 4. Memory usage is increasing. I'll see if I can get more stats.
>> 5. I did change my setup yesterday, skipping clustering and running a
>> standalone instance. just to see if clustering was the issue.
>> 6. If there are mem leaks in netty, is there any workaround?
>>=20
>>=20
>> /hw
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/artem=
is-2-1-0-logging-disaster-tp4726922p4726986.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.