activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?
Date Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:26:54 GMT
Also: Notice that with Kafka you always require a write on the disk...
if you are sending telemetry that you afford losing you may also opt
for non persistent.

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have written this blog post here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/activemq/entry/fast_messaging_with_artemis
>
>
> You can combine that with using MAPPED at your journal type:
>
>
>
>
>       <!-- this could be ASYNCIO or NIO
>
>        -->
>
>       <journal-type>MAPPED</journal-type>
>
>
>
> ** BTW: I'm actually changing this text on "this could be ASYNCIO,
> NIO.. adding MAPPED as well.
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:57 PM, wangqinghuan <1095193290@qq.com> wrote:
>> I don't understand why activemq is so slowly. I read some design document
>> about KafKa. In Kafka,data is immediately written to a persistence log on
>> the filesystem without flushing to disk. In effect this just means that it
>> is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of
>> pagecache-centric design?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message