activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The benifit for multiple Queues?
Date Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:56:37 GMT
To be clear, there's really only 1 addressing model, but that model supports lots of different
use-cases.  It's very flexible and supports traditional pub-sub and point-to-point (as you
noted).

The benefit of supporting multiple "anycast" queues on a single address is simply that if
you need those semantics then they are available to you.  There's nothing inherently "better"
about one semantic vs. another.  It's simply about what your use-case requires.


Justin

----- Original Message -----
From: "wangqinghuan" <1095193290@qq.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 12:07:48 AM
Subject: The benifit  for  multiple Queues?

Artemis has serveral address models. In contrast with Point-to-Point
Messaging , what's the benifits for Point-to-Point Address multiple Queues
.Why defining more than one queue on an address?



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/The-benifit-for-multiple-Queues-tp4727003.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message