Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tbain98@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <9a23657c-9134-98cf-b697-c710dbafe31b@gmail.com>
References: <1495590739714-4726457.post@n4.nabble.com> <1495760128969-4726595.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CAPVVMa-_jJCB5B5ewpm8k4peWzjRmJ_yDv=nZ0xRXU5igQZ28w@mail.gmail.com> <9a23657c-9134-98cf-b697-c710dbafe31b@gmail.com>
From: Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 08:12:08 -0600
Message-ID: <CAPVVMa_BNkB6hjn+hHwNu1ybfhMQuvO0FCYfEPWtzqXH81X+7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Re: BlobMessage in ActiveMQ-CPP by now 2017
To: ActiveMQ Users <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11466472479e6205506dec04"
archived-at: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:12:21 -0000

--001a11466472479e6205506dec04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

E271828, please see the message below from Tim Bish, the developer who
knows the C++ interface the best. Are you willing to use the test setup you
already have plus a debugger to figure out why this isn't working as
expected?

Tim
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Timothy Bish" <tabish121@gmail.com>
Date: May 26, 2017 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: BlobMessage in ActiveMQ-CPP by now 2017
To: "Tim Bain" <tbain@alumni.duke.edu>
Cc:

On 05/26/2017 08:40 AM, Tim Bain wrote:
>
> That's not how I expected it would work. Every message ultimately gets
> converted to the OpenWire protocol, no matter which language you use, so I
> assumed that methods with the same name in the different languages would
> translate to the same OpenWire content, but it sounds like that's not
> happening here.
>
> Tim Bish, could you please explain what users can expect in terms of
> compatibility when using different languages for sending and receiving
> messages? Or is the fact that this particular method isn't compatible
> across languages just a bug?
>
>
> I would suggest some debugging and testing as it's still unclear what's
> been done here.  The plumbing of BlobMessage is mostly not implemented
> outside Java so I don't expect the upload download bits would work, other
> things should but I welcome others who want to contribute to dive in and
> help out with the code and testing.
>
> On May 25, 2017 7:09 PM, "e271828" <165442523@qq.com> wrote:
>
>> Both c++ and java have already implemente setStringProperty and
>> getStringProperty.
>> But I found that send blobmessage by useing the setStringProperty in c++
>> which can not been received  by useing the getStringProperty in java.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab
>> ble.com/BlobMessage-in-ActiveMQ-CPP-by-now-2017-tp4726457p4726595.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>

--001a11466472479e6205506dec04--