Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B41200C7D for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 16:25:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C231D160BAC; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 13D20160B9D for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 16:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24874 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2017 14:25:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 24861 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2017 14:25:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5A3B3C0027 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.693 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nE-NHnX2cjUN for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1BA0D5F5D3 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f135so36518977wmd.0 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=syzO2Jxh7PjHM42i5cmrHMFHquGgw3nsTpClpalJ2nM=; b=M7496t6ntvf7THasDNZW0rBOclpSq8sYvkg2Wa1xnfUDE+d1ReajNa5X8t8klbqKMj 98ePevTc1uLJlShiv+MhO1HqmvyFJvgCvPj+ThaCNOqvXeXv8/JGWg1FzdHc43F3ByS9 z6jl/QH8/aDxfu/9WBVWfAj5BsQljPY985CtCobaGhd1aPPsSjBeNwRbZJLD6ZFJDb7T lrkw4s7BYbHLxrcnyXm+Hr5iGHzxTrt6gABj13FEJeE0kLLPXiy/7e8ruL0H4581F9d+ 2KI0DCY9CO+VAs0jFrJqGo/fvXZcByu0SQWfAqOx0l7qKskdoBw1rOTtYhb8gFDQ8wx0 5GDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=syzO2Jxh7PjHM42i5cmrHMFHquGgw3nsTpClpalJ2nM=; b=SFlHpRBo2snxDHXu3Z9Z0c9dgYGvWA2GKB8X4/zw6PKxh4Us+S1roRcTo9CsApi2XR +MsFiqgiAuienDhkrnY81D9ZE34pXxznaCjZaw1gPi3AszEGM8XiQqwBWgfh2ENv8Hnm J9mD4PsZH81M0jB0kBxw1kkRAL57Ue0S8SrmCCem/7foC7R8aBpN/PtQ8LcOGYtktzBa 6Me7HTokn81uQASWktNxYyLC5T1rkeXIu9KI5CFSZEM7KcBw5DMVAOO7nzx4QCfe4meE 1PIxaMOfOY0FGPqN9MBvPXR1MkFbN0H5B1r1I5saa4uqG8WYVmQ1gm2dv0+6gFj3RJyZ aUTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDg/RLUEL566aMIUU5OzJzcbmm3ku4Wfqb8UhDrVDS+sCenSW0P t9HGum1Hx/0VmYwAlyc7AOc8jBjMMq9R X-Received: by 10.28.33.66 with SMTP id h63mr8290352wmh.86.1494944744643; Tue, 16 May 2017 07:25:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.176.103 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 07:25:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1494942641078-4726197.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1494228838497-4725734.post@n4.nabble.com> <1494942641078-4726197.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Clebert Suconic Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:25:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" archived-at: Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:49 -0000 There isn't much we can do with a single backup pair. On this case you will need 3 pairs... or maybe you could embed zookeeper somehow. We had thought about using zookeeper (which will require more than 3 nodes to elect quorum anyways). We can only guarantee that a single backup/live pair is not isolated on the network. Now if you want to break the system, sure you can do it. if you had more than 3 nodes the quorum would decide to set the node down. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:50 AM, martk <123martin@web.de> wrote: > No, I would like to simulate a busy/overloaded server (e.g. the broker > process is not working correctly). The network is all the time available and > the server is also answering a ping. > > > jbertram wrote >> I realize you're attempting to simulate a network outage, but from what I >> understand using SIGSTOP isn't necessarily an accurate way to do it. It >> was >> explained to me awhile back by a colleague who had done quite a bit of >> work >> in this area that SIGSTOP works differently at the socket level from >> something like pulling a network cable out of a NIC or even killing the >> process. See more here [1]. In mention this because you might want to >> develop an alternate testing mechanism to more accurately simulate a >> network >> outage use-case. >> >> >> Justin >> >> [1] >> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/202104/what-happens-to-requests-to-a-service-that-is-stopped-with-sigstop > > Quoted from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4726194.html > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4726197.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Clebert Suconic