Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
From: Steve Hill <shill@futurelogix.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 23:44:07 -0400
Subject: Re: JMX url in master/slave mode
Message-Id: <26254351-5C6C-43CC-8A64-E9ED3C3A4FD3@futurelogix.co.uk>
References: <1495221448286-4726404.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1495221448286-4726404.post@n4.nabble.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
archived-at: Sat, 20 May 2017 03:44:24 -0000

I would recommend using a load balancer. You would put both up addresses in t=
he load balancer.

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 19, 2017, at 3:17 PM, kpdude7 <kpdude7@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> How would someone programmatically access the correct JMX server in this
> master/slave configuration? For example, I have the JMX url:
>=20
> service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://${jmxTransferUrl}/jmxrmi
>=20
> My JMS is using a failover url:
> failover:(ssl://10.91.5.190:61616,ssl://10.91.5.115:61616)
>=20
> What value should be substituted for ${jmxTransferUrl} above? Do I have to=

> try each IP in the failover url manually and catch an exception before
> trying the next one? Is there another way to do this?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMX-ur=
l-in-master-slave-mode-tp4726404.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.