Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667FC200C68 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 19:03:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6522F160BB5; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D2255160BA1 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 19:03:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 43070 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2017 17:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43059 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2017 17:03:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 May 2017 17:03:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4F2611A0707 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.815 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.815 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_LINKBAIT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JImdLoQ_fcjF for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 14E8E5F5F9 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7763C3EB86225 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 10:03:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT) From: mtod To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1493830316634-4725552.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1493810621162-4725505.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1493375722906-4725331.post@n4.nabble.com> <1493810621162-4725505.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: broker to broker testing scenario MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 03 May 2017 17:03:49 -0000 I can attest to the embedded camel for ActiveMQ we have been running a route in production for 3 years+ with no issues. I use it for message routing based on content. Mike -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/broker-to-broker-testing-scenario-tp4725331p4725552.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.