activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lei <lehu...@paypal.com>
Subject Re: problems with master slave set up artemis 2.0
Date Wed, 10 May 2017 21:18:35 GMT
Thank you Justin for the reply.

For the third case, i did both kill -9 and normal stop, and the symptom is
the same, basically the "idle" backup was not able to become an "active"
backup.

For the first two cases, if it is expected behavior, how would we expect the
replication delay or even data loss on the "idle" slave when it becomes
"active" as it doesn't have any replication going on before its start up,
especially in the scenario where the "active" slave fails shortly after the
master?


thanks,
Lei



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/problems-with-master-slave-set-up-artemis-2-0-tp4725854p4725928.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message