Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1486121944351-4721562.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <DB6PR0602MB2823ED3C1A022BD4AD8610D3FB720@DB6PR0602MB2823.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAKF+bsproNetCcuv8gP0PrZLCi57dkPxxPAkT+K5GHf-9J8Mhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1485788293667-4721395.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAKF+bsq+8R9TUVNQh_M+ee=cABC02fDbyiFGOAFABrMZnEHQJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1485862037305-4721417.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAKF+bsoeVqdvgdQwb4fzcaHOAHh-5MEJY7+vwY2NYoObk+-gyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1485954137792-4721470.post@n4.nabble.com> <CAKF+bsoMaQp-7X49=GQJSPw-bhK9pPx4ezXZgNEkvCAKiiYdtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1486121944351-4721562.post@n4.nabble.com>
From: Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:12:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAH6wpnqj7LYHX4H9Lh5Oo2i1qhuvKtsW29ASH4rVAvT58gNmfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a384a2ec8930547dee68a
archived-at: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:12:45 -0000

--001a113a384a2ec8930547dee68a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Francesco,

Thanks for providing this information.  I think there's a couple of things
going on and I'd like to work with you to create some reproducers, we could
have a chat IRC #apache-activemq@freenode.net and I'll see if I can
recreate your env / case in our test suite.

With the case above, the mosquitto client is sending a subscribe frame on
every connection.  Artemis is then treating this as a new subscription
(even though the subscription queue already exists), and is copying over
the retain messages.  It's a reasonably trivial change, I should have a fix
for you shortly.

Thanks
Martyn

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:39 AM, francesco81 <Francesco.PADOVANI@bticino.it>
wrote:

> Hi Clebert,
> ok, we will build some junit tests to replicate the problem, follwing the
> exemple section.
> Meanwhile, I can confirm to you the bug(s): it seems that the reference to
> the message is never removed from the queue. If the message is not retained
> it persists 1 reference on the queue and every time my client reconnect to
> the broker it will receive always the same message. If the message is
> retained is even worse, because it goes to increment the references on the
> queue and every time the client connects to the broker it will receive n +
> 1
> times the same retained message where n is the re-connection number n.
> Following a simple test I made by using mosquitto client:
>
> CLIENT 1 (publisher):
> mosquitto_pub -h <host> -q 1 -i <client_id_pub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state -m "test non retained"
>
> CLIENT 2 (subscriber):
> 1 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received:
> *test non retained*
> 2 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received again:
> *test non retained*
> 3 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received again:
> *test non retained*
> ...
> and so on
>
> CLIENT 1 (publisher):
> mosquitto_pub -h <host> -q 1 -i <client_id_pub> -r -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state -m "test retained"
>
> CLIENT 2 (subscriber):
> 4 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received:
> *test retained
> test non retained
> test retained*
> 5 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received:
> *test retained
> test non retained
> test retained
> test retained*
> 6 connection:
> mosquitto_sub -h <host> -q 2 -i <client_id_sub> -t
> /cro/plantid/0000000/gwid/00001/device_state
> --> received:
> *test non retained
> test retained
> test retained
> test retained
> test retained*
> ...
> and so on.
>
> If you agree, I would open a bug for this.
>
> Francesco
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/ARTEMIS-bad-performance-behaviour-after-7-10-days-of-usage-
> tp4721272p4721562.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--001a113a384a2ec8930547dee68a--