Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CDA200BD6 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:33:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 014D7160B0E; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B1D4160AE4 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:33:28 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 43841 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2016 15:33:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43821 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2016 15:33:27 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:33:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A70B4C036D for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:33:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.609 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.609 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.065] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8kRuwasZAt0A for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f177.google.com (mail-ua0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B6C975F2EF for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f177.google.com with SMTP id b35so326212918uaa.3 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 07:33:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=f6SwTvWSi8+SRtv9Jq6xVVBbX+M/K4H/MJTgKFBl8Q4=; b=FgTDjN8jcrMyC4cyJtJSF/7S4ipOZT/nfxRms1aMkJMDxaioPfz86BXktcohuyJZDm NjQtEkfoamfQyAUMrQm51qvEzKVHL7RloACqyRs/D3C8/M++S/Zwv2rJDbgWc1Qhe7Yp +bZd/VFAozLyfq8vlzNYZu69x+wPKLr70494x5XT48FVqbpFDP4cHthfI0kkZqNtwI8W zWsWnVBhRcGiXclxh4v7DMJUY0/kgxAaTb2hiLtrPYSTw0bWvy8dn4jCOJAqeL50XUBX C7ysz2g21SfYl66Rir/VLKrTFxSX8xcQwctVkVbEHfivS4HKUEQIUWY2qe/vimOO/vLe VGBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=f6SwTvWSi8+SRtv9Jq6xVVBbX+M/K4H/MJTgKFBl8Q4=; b=cHmeBfTPwcwCiFD81NxzhaAMmil+Wj5rIUW/Gbm5x+iKfhDa5HmXIE7Eht13AZEMP8 l30hbilaomcOrbl903Mi+WwfeGXAxt+P/JfIKl6ndyA6GjpwlR2gZ2tXHdmVtp9YYaYS v4GmnxC5wZZNUG4RhpckVUACl549+JyPStxTkIRpHsTzy7oowaBVw3Tf+xp9Ajm0csvD /INEt8ZYNjZ+PQC4ScEAeFg+0uR+2yGS49H7oawqTmd12v/6tOBez4hSJUlM7XaCIGhk +aJhFWqOa5x1ZCVjV1aNKFbrVqRHeosKjTlT7jY2vUOqiftUtT0ygk5SsXiZ0lWtkcD5 1k7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01AfRrPhQqc/uYSGgZQOXS1l4zrnQnNxw0l1ieu8tqoyieNUNHNMjLfSc7yqA8j0UBnNf5Fdjuil0WQFw== X-Received: by 10.159.48.145 with SMTP id j17mr31672919uab.43.1480865600448; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 07:33:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.26.133 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 07:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.26.133 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 07:33:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1480058894698-4719488.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1478171689551-4718852.post@n4.nabble.com> <1479108069178-4719193.post@n4.nabble.com> <1479188823611-4719226.post@n4.nabble.com> <1479744211221-4719329.post@n4.nabble.com> <1480058894698-4719488.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Tim Bain Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 08:33:19 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I2LYSBAMSrJt7vhuV_F1pIi6Oeg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Network of brokers: consumers not synchronized To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045dd990132eae0542d6e496 archived-at: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:33:29 -0000 --f403045dd990132eae0542d6e496 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 So I was thinking about something more like netstat, to answer the question at the TCP layer. I've never used Karaf, but the documentation doesn't seem to provide a way to do that from within the container, but at a minimum you can run netstat on the host on which Karaf is running. I'm wondering whether your mobile broker is connecting to a different broker (not your backoffice one), which could explain why the mobile broker says it's connected but the backoffice one says it's not. Knowing where the TCP connection is going would help with that. Tim On Nov 25, 2016 6:09 AM, "jochenw" wrote: > Hello, > > found the right command: activemq:query | grep -A 10 -B 10 > networkConnectors. > > And the problem occurred again, so I could check this. The network > connector > is present on the mobile broker, but the web console of the backoffice > broker doesn't show a connection. > > Regards, > Jochen > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-consumers-not-synchronized- > tp4718852p4719488.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --f403045dd990132eae0542d6e496--