Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C200B200BB0 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:09:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C081C160AF4; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 10F0F160AF1 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:09:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 57540 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2016 01:09:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 57524 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2016 01:09:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 932701A043B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.608 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.608 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.065] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3R4VWKFAJ3z for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (mail-vk0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B40F75FAD5 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 2so143949854vkb.3 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:09:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=tnI2h80MjLaWfIGgBCbsLbSwkjSxayGCknjjF37bwYE=; b=YvKlqj9sxbwVmtRRK4hvzKmBKgB7twLaDxZyDo5vctLvsBJ0y85ir08tTF7swWIxlo DI1Cz+ZW1cjQKAvjUYaoIQYeGN4NtVrN2NfFnO5pTrgPBLzY5/9OjiZYzUAset2AlFJC qLlRjUdl36ZN344WdSqUwQ7sKXCIi+coWqeEAWsSiv4CxNcYi4+8ME730uZsAPPY+Cgd 2SRJflH91ogcG7cMqqDPE0qnyZBVfDjLhIUPmeFoBePWazKlekZSyjl0paopmjZVCc81 IRJxaa3azfKEO9pm/bMmIoN9YzeNbhQSc5y4FNaAXKJxdL3mie4a0kJOKqKkBFEqJtCJ LIbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tnI2h80MjLaWfIGgBCbsLbSwkjSxayGCknjjF37bwYE=; b=XyAg3MEVTrKzkUVjcYM+p5DswuVOP2TuFqOF68sno+jE3B/18YolMtHA7Z7ftzXYKb Dx/KmvGMOzsoBfEF9APulylgTiy89PO37wRyXQwgGyC7Bse4Nl+3t4owe2LQ2bKP+4RA wsGSc5f/Sn2wBb2l+SEL3LflbFZf/G8rCp8wxGTi9+g7fg+7XEsA5HIdgO0gnuq+EoKU bdYdlkjdQbvEZ8vJ3oG68r43arTYBJhCmje1hZ1qzKqnTO/YsbzYUFsGrwWujnMu8Wtf 7lz56dU2RUn4eVV6zcy3hZVJmyVt0bkOfSLSj4EpY6EYKNCWX0re/zlRcToKSFUAlq4A 54Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmMQY5UlcMvQZSSYN8WieKQgf1AIXSpJ8f0Pri/voBPd6E1jg6CsKiFXU0PTVT70YG1Lv/QC4/Gl39CPA== X-Received: by 10.31.155.205 with SMTP id d196mr10296323vke.133.1476580185509; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:09:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.118.86 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.118.86 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:09:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1475591130171-4717481.post@n4.nabble.com> <1476404787682-4717887.post@n4.nabble.com> <1476500424701-4717957.post@n4.nabble.com> <1476544772597-4717968.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Tim Bain Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:09:44 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bpDbNTQ3ipSUO9TxrxBBj1N5kWE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Virtual topics, custom prefix limitations To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141f4c070949d053ef11dee archived-at: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:09:58 -0000 --001a1141f4c070949d053ef11dee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 BTW, do you have consumers consuming directly from the virtual topic, or only via queues? If you have no topic consumers, I believe you can just remove your excludedDestinations entry and everything will work as intended. As I understand it, the problems only occur when you have a mix of queue and topic consumers. On Oct 15, 2016 6:53 PM, "Tim Bain" wrote: > Correct, statically include the topics, not the queues. > > On Oct 15, 2016 9:27 AM, "Devlin" wrote: > >> Ok, just to be clear, we define the virtual topic statically (the one >> used by >> the producer), not the individual consumer queues. I hope it's the former >> because client queues for virtual topics are named using "app-version" >> convention for grouping related consumers; we can't define those names >> statically as they're too volatile. Will report back on this. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab >> ble.com/Virtual-topics-custom-prefix-limitations-tp4717481p4717968.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > --001a1141f4c070949d053ef11dee--