activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Need help to Improve ActiveMQ performance
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:21:40 GMT
Hi Raghu,

It may also be worth considering ActiveMQ Artemis in your evaluation.  It
has a complete blocking architecture end to end and can delivery excellent
performance.

https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/

Regards
Martyn



On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:

> to have a guarantee the fsync is necessary. possibly move the index to a
> separate disk to reduce contention. To boost throughput, have multiple
> connections publishing at the same time. In this way, multiple parallel
> sends will get the benefit of a batched fsync.
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 at 19:32 RaghuBaddam <raghu98499@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing ActiveMQ and the performance is too low if I use
> > enableJournalDiskSyncs (400 msgs / sec of 10kb) and If I disable
> > enableJournalDiskSyncs (4000 msgs / sec of 10kb) It is really 10times
> > increase in performance, I tuned almost all the ActiveMQ parameters but
> It
> > is not giving any better results, I know that If I enable
> > concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues, we will get good results but before
> that
> > I
> > want to understand that, Is there any other way we can Increase our
> > performance(I know using Transacted session is an option but we have
> > multiple applications so we can’t Insist everyone to use Transacted
> session
> > :( )
> >
> > Is there there any way we can avoid fsync each time with no message loss
> ?
> >
> > We are trying to reach a point where there is No message loss and Good
> > performance with ActiveMQ.
> >
> > Basically we are migrating from Tibco EMS to ActiveMQ, so we really need
> > your help.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance
> > Raghu Baddam
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Raghu Baddam
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-to-Improve-ActiveMQ-performance-tp4713527.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message