activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Need help to Improve ActiveMQ performance
Date Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:29:08 GMT
to have a guarantee the fsync is necessary. possibly move the index to a
separate disk to reduce contention. To boost throughput, have multiple
connections publishing at the same time. In this way, multiple parallel
sends will get the benefit of a batched fsync.


On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 at 19:32 RaghuBaddam <raghu98499@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am testing ActiveMQ and the performance is too low if I use
> enableJournalDiskSyncs (400 msgs / sec of 10kb) and If I disable
> enableJournalDiskSyncs (4000 msgs / sec of 10kb) It is really 10times
> increase in performance, I tuned almost all the ActiveMQ parameters but It
> is not giving any better results, I know that If I enable
> concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues, we will get good results but before that
> I
> want to understand that, Is there any other way we can Increase our
> performance(I know using Transacted session is an option but we have
> multiple applications so we can’t Insist everyone to use Transacted session
> :( )
>
> Is there there any way we can avoid fsync each time with no message loss ?
>
> We are trying to reach a point where there is No message loss and Good
> performance with ActiveMQ.
>
> Basically we are migrating from Tibco EMS to ActiveMQ, so we really need
> your help.
>
> Thanks in Advance
> Raghu Baddam
>
>
>
> -----
> Raghu Baddam
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-to-Improve-ActiveMQ-performance-tp4713527.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message