activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arkin Yetis <arkinye...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question about priorityURIs feature
Date Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:52:27 GMT
Thank you.

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:06 AM Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:

> Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2
> will be tried only if local1 is unavailable.
>
> I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately
> I don't have the ability right now to read the FailoverTransport source
> code to find out.  Though of course you could if you have time.
>
> Tim
> On Jun 17, 2016 5:29 PM, "arkin" <arkinyetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In the following example from
> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
>
>
> failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616
>
> Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the choice between the two
> local urls random?
> Once a connection to local2 is established, the client will not attempt to
> connect to local1 unless the connection to local2 is disrupted. Is that
> correct?
>
> Thanks,
> - Arkin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message