Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30E72007D1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 16:23:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A1ADE160939; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B0901602BF for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 16:23:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 95625 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2016 14:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 95614 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2016 14:23:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 76742180118 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.487 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.487 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6cM5uncEMw3 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 67D825F484 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E316729DC3AFC for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 06:48:00 -0700 (PDT) From: exabrial To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1463060880531-4711861.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1462979265097-4711832.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:23:26 -0000 Ok, that makes sense then why there are two consumers. What's strange to me is the message will travel from spoke1->hub->spoke2 even if there are no consumers on spoke2 if I have staticallyIncludedDestinations set on the spokes. Why is that? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Why-does-having-a-staticallyIncludedDestination-create-a-consumer-tp4711832p4711861.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.