Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D3FB18E3A for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4258 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 14:21:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 4211 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 14:21:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 4197 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2016 14:21:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:21:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E218C059B for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:21:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.28 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.28 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=highwire-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Va2xpReftCeD for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2DCD15FB0A for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id r187so21619945oih.3 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:21:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=highwire-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=enG91QVbPmvFTAxJhLm/mT1IcK/To+6sshfMo1RRh+U=; b=byAEN3t5/cViZWj62hEApv90I9Rk5TYqNRya2qW1AIaY6iJBC6Gh73cB8xKW5QqN1/ PIIgixrmC3tBA0vOjFGQc4NU3hVR413BB+uwf5w+0aS6kI/iw2lMHMWhoaXC9SSs5cU+ hUUT7kJT3Yhd5p6kkJsn+ZTWA7WBV2cmxsgNDlVuLxNLgqPqOsI7cByTyCzGzouzHFDT 5b8GgmLlI52YDQ6uYrp74vDifzVS5WcDS8HxNayNphimxbzFsPYznMvAI6o+KhFdgfCu U8DDr0IDNzA91laKQja/tfRHBDT5SHlCu2u3O4/y2bLgrKc7j6YnbLcJz9RVPrFbNHvH UCJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=enG91QVbPmvFTAxJhLm/mT1IcK/To+6sshfMo1RRh+U=; b=ZQqTuLcWD9bWSm8bUx7u5cpDp+zoFf3OS2yyXe0KQk0jqZB+l/yWCek6Z8/z96OuYT ISu5IIFRek9+y+hKY1ibkMXDho0HLTErFAg9Zap6tIcRaWsgob6SqCxo9T4ja+q5e7Vo NyrbMhF6gYs/W8lUKnspFRDaUrjaWnjigPeD3Mx3OOtBu+3Dftq4emi33ls/PmfZdkgS dxFzIIoyuCwQdeGi9CKeQBQen8Anxvvhz/hE0YRzFqJUzpgKZJps1PcR7zMutNlgK+Rd ZNo8mpEz97Jt8gcwvmqWc1Mg4h4z53OAHp8rf7U20iFQbqlDb115acsGM5KOxtsDkeCc 7avA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIse/gM/AeUsyOqXtZLxvP6zCwmS7GDwYzsQm1Jp5yduVCtYQHQpBuso2F1GYuNiaKL+MqYfvldhA0E6A== X-Received: by 10.157.36.197 with SMTP id z63mr1711541ota.17.1458742901624; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:21:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "James A. Robinson" Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:21:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS v4 locks "given up" w/o any logging? To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c035bfe785823052eb80cab --94eb2c035bfe785823052eb80cab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for the information. Would you be able to tell me if your NetApp settings for the lock lease are the standard values? I'm told that it's 30 seconds, I was thinking about whether or not I needed to have that raised much higher to prevent the particular issue I'm seeing (the tcp layer trying to send SYN packets for 3 minutes before giving up)? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:27 PM Paul Gale wrote: > We're using the following with our NetApp device: > > -rw,soft,intr,noexec,nosuid,nodev,users,rsize=3D65535,wsize=3D65535,proto= =3Dtcp > > =E2=80=8BWhilst 'soft' is generally not recommended I've found that using= 'hard' > causes the broker to lock up immediately. > The settings we have in place above were chosen by our storage team. > > Thanks, > Paul > --94eb2c035bfe785823052eb80cab--