Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48E5318636 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60564 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2016 00:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 60520 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2016 00:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 60509 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2016 00:18:54 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:18:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5A81CC1A80 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:18:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.551 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.551 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.065] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjHsaVVrf2wZ for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0FEBB2565F for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A3413C32BA4 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:11:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:54:04 -0800 (PST) From: mhemple To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1455234844565-4707430.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1455070417761-4707380.post@n4.nabble.com> <1455134329987-4707395.post@n4.nabble.com> <1455210490372-4707425.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Messages dequeued but not consumed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes we are using ActiveMQObjectMessages. ActiveMQTextMessages are working for our other queues. I would love to serialize to text but, unfortunately that isn't an option at this point. We're using object messages with Hornet without issue. Are there major differences between object messages from the two brokers? I don't think we're doing anything that would cause deserialization on the broker. I added our jar to the AMQ classpath just in case, but the problem persists. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-dequeued-but-not-consumed-tp4707380p4707430.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.