Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC47218A2F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74071 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 13:48:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 74023 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 13:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 73996 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2016 13:48:33 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:48:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 75E21C0417 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:48:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.545 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.545 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtNDBYyBfkrN for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B265243A0F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ik10so196377994igb.1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/aqdujIpfzjJBseapVueq3rTRZHJHMCQZUo/NjrZE0I=; b=qFIfSsf/KCAQhZ6F1phNiyIOkB8ujYGMlTCCuxMf27Syd+XKTUVV5x/Q3GmF2Q2m2a 3G718Z4n3/wHt0jdnBC/pz1Xy/IJ7jSiyX/ExQrusK2xtGhziJT1I19xMuFJVE9kPG6m 7N1w6niZ9Dqj8lJ7gfjwwEXBcjVT9fSCTCqaCrsp+RgtnnJ1XV/E1zJowsdj9X35tJFk mBhz6I7a40wZyuSSVfGu+BIhUS1aoVcgklAf2UOmUWqS2V+VtlzDIFYpwvBaYYtE555l lPeT4lKBan1TUhjQPkKDla6B1VxWQtHiQqqFSFvKWRh+4S3nbF4Dz94SErhUBK1ywxaK 0SGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/aqdujIpfzjJBseapVueq3rTRZHJHMCQZUo/NjrZE0I=; b=BMzWJ868vmRAn+Zdcl6hqN1zM71oSIhrUMteVTlgBk7Da0TqcplqQBxgd0kmfPfBny tXm3SPSstpOfB/l3A+AHhPRnGzNy9aeLO9g6kwwsSoUuraoiBt2CSEr1sV+ulaMEb871 97sbuovapv5T/Ia05w0rVEl0IAUlbZS3hQpZeJH2OhD+2uQQhzVIgJzZuPOOJhHW4Q/P myxRq4i8Pbd3ddpy9pm4ATUjVn3T5wPNZg/QYakb/HDRuG/6UJnb/mVkm7q4gwHEEuiD PSTJ/1h/js0l3Iv6ILvDF2hMRAu6LiihSx/fOltsZHbbh1IOf+1b9BKQQYacpU61ixb7 /umA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8uiDj9qYUcVdngtuL2GboCYFOE1TplqAcJrzp2SBdm7IC91lkCAsLKQJWw0y3SdDY12Hh6f27qyKrw9eRuGf8irtDxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.150.36 with SMTP id uf4mr4658880igb.61.1452779307266; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.249.42 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.249.42 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1452759867108-4705980.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1452759867108-4705980.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 06:48:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7HW3BghJJyxIackxDfbJEe8pkJo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues with stand alone web console in 5.7 using a master/slave architecture From: Tim Bain To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113372368bf86705294b8a1b --001a113372368bf86705294b8a1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Note that what you're asking for is not a fix, but rather an enhancement. Nothing's broken: the failover transport is successfully connecting to the first responsive URI in the list, it's just that that's not the behavior you actually want. Which simply means that the failover transport isn't the appropriate way to try to achieve this, even if it did happen to work in previous versions of ActiveMQ. I personally don't know if anyone has implemented the capability you're hoping for, though you could easily go through all the resolved JIRA entries in each of the versions between your current one and the one you're planning to upgrade to, to determine whether the new version will have the capability. Tim On Jan 14, 2016 1:46 AM, "ruffp" wrote: > We have a serviceMix 4.3 which use the same ActiveMQ (embedded) and we also > have the issue. > > In another deployment, we use ActiveMQ 5.10.x and apparently the > activemqweb > is working better (still few bugs when you browse queue from the slave > instance) but quite more stable anyway. > > We plan to migrate our ActiveMQ to 5.10.x but in the meantime is there any > fix for the activemqweb on version 5.7? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-stand-alone-web-console-in-5-7-using-a-master-slave-architecture-tp4661538p4705980.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001a113372368bf86705294b8a1b--