activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Client and server artifacts in Spring JMS example.
Date Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:47:28 GMT
If you are making small contributions such as doc improvements, bug
fixes, examples and other trivital (trivial I mean... you're not
writing a feature) stuff (Pull Requests should do fine). if you don't
like github, you can also attach diffs to JIRAs. but git is awesome :)

If you are willing to make major feature contributions(which we would
love to BTW):

Individual or corporate agreements:
https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Derek Mahar <derek.mahar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I would be willing to update some of the examples.  Must I sign any
> contributor agreement in order for Apache to accept my contributions?
>
> On 12 January 2016 at 14:39, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Derek, as you're touching the spring example... it would be great if
>> you can make contributions to the example.. PRs.. etc...
>>
>> The example still using the TransportConfiguration, while it's easier
>> to use URIs. if you make any simplification or improvements it would
>> be great if you sent a Pull Request (or a diff if you prefer).
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Keep in mind that the configuration for the broker would need to change
>> if it's in another JVM as the example only supports in-vm connections.
>> >
>> >
>> > Justin
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Justin Bertram" <jbertram@apache.com>
>> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:18:37 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Client and server artifacts in Spring JMS example.
>> >
>> > You're mostly right.  Everything but the "securityManager" and
>> "EmbeddedJms" beans are for the client.
>> >
>> >
>> > Justin
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Derek Mahar" <derek.mahar@gmail.com>
>> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:14:12 PM
>> > Subject: Client and server artifacts in Spring JMS example.
>> >
>> > From
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/examples/features/standard/spring-integration/src/main/resources/spring-jms-beans.xml
>> ,
>> > would it be accurate to separate the beans into the following lists of
>> > client and server components?
>> >
>> > Client
>> >
>> > - connectionFactory
>> > (org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory)
>> > - exampleQueue (org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQQueue)
>> > - MessageSender (org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.example.MessageSender)
>> >
>> >
>> > Server
>> >
>> > - securityManager
>> >
>> (org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.security.ActiveMQJAASSecurityManager)
>> > - EmbeddedJms
>> > (org.apache.activemq.artemis.integration.spring.SpringJmsBootstrap)
>> > - listener (org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.example.ExampleListener)
>> > - listenerContainer
>> > (org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer)
>> >
>> > The purpose of this exercise would be to isolate the server from the
>> client
>> > components in order to embed the server components alone into another
>> > server process.
>> >
>> > Derek
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message