Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AB5118329 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45477 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2015 20:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45429 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2015 20:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45418 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2015 20:00:57 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:00:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E1836C023A for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:00:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.738 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.738 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RErMOA2rIySU for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9D7C942A73 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4156B753C5B0 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:58:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:41:45 -0800 (PST) From: khaing211 To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1450986105463-4705439.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: How come we don't have PagingStoreFactoryAIO? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, How come we don't have PagingStoreFactoryAIO? We only have PagingStoreFactoryNIO which is created in ActiveMQServerImpl#createPagingManager(). Also, some of values pass in to the constructor is of journal configuration. * configuration.getJournalBufferTimeout_NIO * configuration.isJournalSyncNonTransactional It does not make sense when I configure journal-type to AIO. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-come-we-don-t-have-PagingStoreFactoryAIO-tp4705439.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.