activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>
Subject Re: NoB and Load Balancing
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:26:31 GMT
Are you saying that you're using the priorityBackup=true option, or not?
That wasn't clear (to me) from what you wrote.

Tim

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Rallavagu <rallavagu@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you are referring "priorityBackup=true" then I have only one URL with
> master/slave and NoB and expect the "updateClusterClients" to work. One
> more item that I have noticed is that, when two clients are connected to
> one of the clusters, when the third client is attempting to connect to the
> same cluster, it is actually forwarded to connect to other cluster (which
> has no clients at that time).
>
>
> On 12/9/15 6:21 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote:
>
>> I don't believe client failback would work with those settings alone,
>> Read section titled "More information" here
>> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rallavagu [mailto:rallavagu@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 8:40 PM
>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: NoB and Load Balancing [ EXTERNAL ]
>>
>> I am using the example that are shipped with ActiveMQ. Here is the
>> example,
>>
>> /opt/activemq/apache-ant-1.9.6/bin/ant consumer -Durl=failover:'(tcp://
>> activemq2.localtest.net:61616)' -Dtopic=false -Dsubject=foo.bar
>>
>> On 12/9/15 4:19 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote:
>>
>>> Show the client-side configuration you're using.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Rallavagu [mailto:rallavagu@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 7:04 PM
>>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>>> Subject: NoB and Load Balancing [ EXTERNAL ]
>>>
>>> ActiveMQ 5.12.1
>>>
>>> Setup Network of Brokers between two clusters of Master/Slave brokers.
>>> With reference to following links,
>>>
>>> http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-features-in-activemq-54-au
>>> tomatic.html
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
>>>
>>> Configured "updateClusterClients" and "rebalanceClusterClients" to
>>> achieve load balancing. Used a test case as below.
>>>
>>> 1. connect client 1 to cluster 1
>>> 2. connect client 2 to cluster 2
>>> 3. shutdown cluster 1. Now, client 1 is automatically connected to
>>> cluster 2.
>>> 4. started cluster 1 back.
>>>
>>> Was expecting client 1 to re-connect to cluster 1 and balance the load.
>>> But, I do not see that happening. Is this the right expectation? Also, I
>>> have noticed that some times if two clients are connecting to one of the
>>> clusters, they are automatically re-connected to other cluster which is a
>>> desirable behavior. Essentially, Wondering if I can rely one those
>>> configuration parameters for load balancing. Thanks.
>>>
>>> This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary,
>>> privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the
>>> person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or
>>> disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended
>>> recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return
>>> e-mail and delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion,
>>> monitor, review, retain and/or disclose the content of all email
>>> communications.
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message