activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>
Subject Re: Network of Brokers: XAException on Failover
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:06:03 GMT
A network of brokers can be used for HA as long as the network topology
will remain fully connected in the face of N failures (for whatever value
of N you choose to support, probably 1) and the clients' failover URIs will
always contain a live broker in the face of the same failure(s).

But you could also consider master/slave pairs using LevelDB as the storage
technology, which doesn't have a single point of failure.

Tim
On Sep 29, 2015 3:45 PM, "mhempleman" <matthew.hempleman@alstom.com> wrote:

> Maybe I'm not using the network of brokers in the correct manner.  Should a
> network of brokers be used for HA, or just scalability and load balancing?
>
> We are not concerned with the loss of a few messages if one broker fails;
> however, we want to make sure there is not a single point of failure in the
> system (one broker node), and we want the client to failover seamlessly in
> the event of a failure (which is not currently happening... see previous
> message).  I looked into master/slave setups, but each seems to have a
> single point of failure.  The failure points in the shared filesystem and
> shared db configurations are obvious.  Any advice would be greatly
> appreciated.  Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers-XAException-on-Failover-tp4702355p4702445.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message