activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu>
Subject Re: Transports available for networkConnectors
Date Tue, 06 Oct 2015 04:02:12 GMT
Chris,

Thanks for the confirmation.

Will it only work if auto.protocols includes "default"?  Or can another
protocol be used (AMQP or MQTT, presumably, since my understanding is that
STOMP isn't supported)?

Tim

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:

> The auto transport should work but only if the activemq-broker jar is on
> the classpath.  It would just use OpenWire.
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:50 AM, <barry.barnett@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
> > Ill keep you posted as to how the duplex works with ssl...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tbain98@gmail.com [mailto:tbain98@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain
> > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 9:45 AM
> > To: ActiveMQ Users
> > Subject: Transports available for networkConnectors
> >
> > Can someone provide a list of which transports are allowed in
> > broker-to-broker networkConnectors and which are not?
> >
> > Obviously tcp works.  Barry Barnett's recent thread made it clear that
> ssl
> > works (though maybe not for duplex connections), which was news to me.
> > http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html says that http and
> > multicast both work, and that "ActiveMQ also supports other transports
> than
> > tcp", which isn't very useful.  Previous posts to this mailing list made
> it
> > clear that stomp doesn't work.  What's missing (other than the "wrapper"
> > transports such as static, failover, etc.), and are they supported?  Does
> > the new auto transport (http://activemq.apache.org/auto.html) work
> there?
> >
> > I can update the documentation to capture this information if someone can
> > provide it.
> >
> > Tim
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message