Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79E8F17F29 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70991 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2015 15:48:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 70951 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2015 15:48:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 48541 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2015 01:57:56 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.234 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.234 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_FAIL=0.919, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 18:51:28 -0700 (PDT) From: AKGavin To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1441504288676-4701754.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1441178535010-4701615.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: activemq5.11 producer speed and consumer speed is lower,why? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "did you use the same settings between the two tests? if you have a test under the same settings and conditions giving you different result, then you should share your test, and so people could identify the difference." @Clebert Suconic Yes, Two machines configuration is the same, two tests for AMQ set is the same. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq5-11-producer-speed-and-consumer-speed-is-lower-why-tp4701615p4701754.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.