From users-return-42676-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Fri Aug 7 15:23:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89E0F180C0 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80895 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 15:23:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 80855 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 15:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 80839 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2015 15:23:17 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:23:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 917A319E318 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:23:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.488 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.488 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9dvdPniSCNS for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1686520CF5 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4E2593700 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT) From: sheltomt To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1438960819476-4700555.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1438892522294-4700531.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1438801474230-4700462.post@n4.nabble.com> <1438892522294-4700531.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Adding a 2nd broker to a default installation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The new broker would be independent The existing broker is simply on the default installation. No "create" statement was used that would generate one of the seperate broker instance directory structures. Our main concern here is leaving the current installation untouched and working, with no need to change any ports or code for that instance. So from what you're saying, if I simply create that second broker, which would create it's subdirectory structure under ./activeMQinstallpath/instance2/ , that will not only leave the initial installation untouched, but will allow me to fully modify the new broker for port config, as well as having it's own queue database, etc? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Adding-a-2nd-broker-to-a-default-installation-tp4700462p4700555.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.