Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AEB3187CB for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23827 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 20:22:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 23790 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 20:22:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 23778 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2015 20:22:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:22:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 100F1C137E for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:22:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.736 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.736 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=1.171] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZGNWTm1Z-kK for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 83BC023164 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so4722149igb.1 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=aSW/HFjSOJdFayFGV0kMVp6Yuf930PKr0u3l3xv3wQc=; b=iGIzOTMrolgJG+fJq2yDN4ibaW/HKZ34Q6ZZ5mcVjRqMXlPKp/ZYCwBkrepjFMUTJ9 8CyQ5HoP6AdylOGbajIgmRgqc+ZpDGri8nshUauuXrcyGPq/B1x3PG+PeL1+MKmAvOr+ j3rY18jP3J2BfYde1VGeVMLM+7lAmrtQc2xrqYMEd6gg0+unmdbAHWqlTqswDhPlEyjR QeVBhdC502z3s/Mqvf7xD5HSoEXN1paIYUboqP+10W4FOPNjtyjKa5/lh5WlaGQ7ep8L 2Y6H8cKt6t9H5AXfjhsekv7Wi2pFbUcP1VKFzofI2FHtV524Dc62jICXZcIVDkEgR8zN 9tFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.163.129 with SMTP id mo1mr22536766icc.61.1431721277452; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.251.141 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.251.141 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1431703698220-4696576.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1431703698220-4696576.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:21:17 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BURsRf86n4b7fb2ZQmy4nNJPh8U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Minor Release vs Major Release From: Tim Bain To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30b4e28f999051624963f --001a11c30b4e28f999051624963f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Caveat: I'm not a committer and I'm not on the dev mailing list, so this is just what I've pieced together from things I've observed. Some or all of it might be wrong. Major releases have generally happened when there's a significant technological change that involves changing fundamental paradigms or technologies. We've been in major release 5 since 5.0.0 was released on December 7, 2007, so clearly annual major releases aren't the plan. Major release 6 was originally slated to be the adoption of the Apollo codebase (technological change), but that development effort stalled and the HornetQ codebase was donated to the Apache Foundation, so it's now expected that 6.x will be the version based on HornetQ. For minor releases, you're right that the goal is 1-2 per year, so fixes get to the community without too much of a wait. Patch releases happen if necessary to fix critical bugs that can't wait for the next minor release; they generally are triggered by security or performance bugs, though once there's going to be a patch release, less-critical bug fixes are sometimes backported as well. Some minor releases have multiple, while others have none; it's all based on need. Tim On May 15, 2015 9:45 AM, "asaran" wrote: > Request you to please let me know whats the difference between minor > release > and major release. > > Looking at the release cycle it appears we do two minor release a year and > a > major release a year. Please confirm, Do we have any link that explans the > future road map of AMQ? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Minor-Release-vs-Major-Release-tp4696576.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001a11c30b4e28f999051624963f--